Commit 44a8e86d authored by Wayne Davison's avatar Wayne Davison

Mention the change in how "incoming chmod" works when --perms was

not specified.
parent 73abdda4
...@@ -266,10 +266,9 @@ See the "exclude" option above. ...@@ -266,10 +266,9 @@ See the "exclude" option above.
dit(bf(incoming chmod)) This option allows you to specify a set of dit(bf(incoming chmod)) This option allows you to specify a set of
comma-separated chmod strings that will affect the permissions of all comma-separated chmod strings that will affect the permissions of all
incoming files (files that are being received by the daemon). These incoming files (files that are being received by the daemon). These
changes happen after any user-requested changes the client requested via changes happen after all other permission calculations, and this will
bf(--chmod). Note, however, the if the client didn't specify bf(--perms), even override destination-default and/or existing permissions when the
the daemon's umask setting will still mask the value before it is used, so client does not specify bf(--perms).
be sure it is set appropriately if this is a concern.
See the description of the bf(--chmod) rsync option and the bf(chmod)(1) See the description of the bf(--chmod) rsync option and the bf(chmod)(1)
manpage for information on the format of this string. manpage for information on the format of this string.
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment