-
Andreas Rheinhardt authored
There is no check for whether these supposedly redundant PPS are actually redundant. One could check via memcmp which would work in practice* (because all content buffers are initially zero-allocated), but this is not portable as compilers may trash padding inside structures as they wish. In case the PPS is not really redundant the output is garbage. This happens with several files from the FATE-suite. E.g. h264-conformance/CVCANLMA2_Sony_C.jsv doesn't decode correctly any more, whereas h264-conformance/CABA3_TOSHIBA_E.264 even fails in ff_cbs_write_packet(), because the inferred value of num_ref_idx_l0_active_minus1 mismatches with the value set in the slice (this happens when num_ref_idx_l0_default_active_minus1 changes in the PPS; the value in the slice header is inferred from the original PPS's num_ref_idx_l0_default_active_minus1). *: Unless slice_group_id is used, i.e. unless slice_group_map_type is six. Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com>
7ae1c0dd