Commit 969999ea authored by Nils Goroll's avatar Nils Goroll

fix debug output: entry was renamed to dcs_entry

parent 31333ebb
......@@ -1271,7 +1271,7 @@ dcs_register_subkey_match(struct dcs_matchstate *state, dcs_subkey_id_t subkey_i
if (state->matchmask[entry_index] == dcs_entry[entry_index].matchmask) {
dcs_state_remove_candidate(state, entry_index);
P_SK_MATCH("removed candidate index %d id %d this 0x%x mask 0x%x need 0x%x\n",
entry_index, entry[entry_index].id,
entry_index, dcs_entry[entry_index].id,
(1<<sk2e->entry_subkey),
state->matchmask[entry_index] & ~((uint32_t)(1 << sk2e->entry_subkey)),
dcs_entry[entry_index].matchmask);
......@@ -1317,7 +1317,7 @@ dcs_register_subkey_match(struct dcs_matchstate *state, dcs_subkey_id_t subkey_i
state->first_match_entry = entry_index;
state->last_match_entry = entry_index;
P_SK_MATCH(" match index %d id %d this 0x%x mask 0x%x need 0x%x\n",
entry_index, entry[entry_index].id,
entry_index, dcs_entry[entry_index].id,
(1<<sk2e->entry_subkey),
state->matchmask[entry_index],
dcs_entry[entry_index].matchmask);
......@@ -1332,7 +1332,7 @@ dcs_register_subkey_match(struct dcs_matchstate *state, dcs_subkey_id_t subkey_i
/* has negative matches */
dcs_state_add_candidate(state, entry_index);
P_SK_MATCH("added candidate index %d id %d this 0x%x mask 0x%x need 0x%x\n",
entry_index, entry[entry_index].index,
entry_index, dcs_entry[entry_index].index,
(1<<sk2e->entry_subkey),
state->matchmask[entry_index],
dcs_entry[entry_index].matchmask);
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment