-
Nils Goroll authored
The previous commit went in the right direction, but was not correct. For CHK_ORDER, we must only ever look at type != T_NEXUS and check any T_NEXUS by the criteria originally passed. CHK_ORDER could be stricter still, after a subtree is completed, we could communicate up the stricter CHK_PEND, but I do not want to complicate things further for an assertion.
e493852e