-
Poul-Henning Kamp authored
So imagine an object during fetch, where we have allocated the storage for the object structure, the persistent silo gets synced, so the data ends up in the next segment, and then we crash before that segment gets synched to silo. On restart the object looks good, until we try to access its storage... *bewm* This is a stopgap, that catches such objects and neuters them, using a set of paranoid sanitychecks we should employ in any case. There still is a relevant hole: As above, but after the restart we manage to write a new segment before the initial object is accessed, and it happens to have a storage structure just the same place (not unlikely at the beginning) We do not crash in this case, but deliver wrong content. Did I ever mention that -spersistent for all practical purposes is a filesytem ?
f9a8797d