.expected_response is a better idea than .status

Tip o' the hat to: tfheen



git-svn-id: http://www.varnish-cache.org/svn/trunk/varnish-cache@4357 d4fa192b-c00b-0410-8231-f00ffab90ce4

bin/varnishtest/tests/v00002.vtc

@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ varnish v1 -badvcl {
 varnish v1 -badvcl {
 	backend b1 {
 		.host = "127.0.0.1";
-		.probe = { .status = 13; }
+		.probe = { .expected_response = 13; }
 	}
 }
 

bin/varnishtest/tests/v00005.vtc

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ varnish v1 -vcl {
 	backend b1 {
 		.host = "127.0.0.1";
 		.probe = {
-			.status = 204;
+			.expected_response = 204;
 		}
 	}
 }

lib/libvcl/vcc_backend.c

@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ vcc_ParseProbe(struct tokenlist *tl)
 	fs = vcc_FldSpec(tl,
 	    "?url",
 	    "?request",
-	    "?status",
+	    "?expected_response",
 	    "?timeout",
 	    "?interval",
 	    "?window",
@@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ vcc_ParseProbe(struct tokenlist *tl)
 			initial = vcc_UintVal(tl);
 			vcc_NextToken(tl);
 			ERRCHK(tl);
-		} else if (vcc_IdIs(t_field, "status")) {
+		} else if (vcc_IdIs(t_field, "expected_response")) {
 			status = vcc_UintVal(tl);
 			if (status < 100 || status > 999) {
 				vsb_printf(tl->sb,