-
Dridi Boukelmoune authored
As I was relying on the lack of -E option to discard another type of non-ESI sub-requests I recently misled myself with this assumption. It took me a while to realize that I was also seeing transactions I was not interested in, corrupting the statistics I was deriving from a log dump. Now that vmod_pesi [1] sets the precedent, we should expect new types of sub-requests to materialize and expecting the reason for the transaction to be "esi" is no longer appropriate. We could also track this field as vtx::sub_level for example, to make it available as VSL query LHS operand. The focus here was to adjust the behavior of an existing feature, not add a new one. [1] https://code.uplex.de/uplex-varnish/libvdp-pesi
07a785eb