Restore previous VRT_AddDirector semantics
Upon failure, don't destroy the underlying director implementation. When the deletion code was split in c671bb66 in order to be reused in 61529854, it mistakenly included the director implementation. Instead, it's really the caller's job to tear down the backend if it couldn't be added. Since vbe_destroy operates on a director, it is split in two to avoid reintroducing the previous "undo" code duplication. Refs #3176
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment