Fix structure of vcl-variables(7)

Previously, "HTTP response status" was rendered of a subsection
of "storage", which is wrong, they should be on the same
level, or at least not in that order.

We now use the order = - ~ for section, subsection, subsubsection which
we also use in other places like vcl(7) and which is in line with
the example in https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/user/rst/quickstart.html#sections
parent 0d603872
......@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
local, server, remote and client
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--------------------------------
These variables describe the network connection between the
client and varnishd.
......@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ local.socket ``VCL >= 4.1``
req and req_top
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
---------------
These variables describe the present request, and when ESI:include
requests are being processed, req_top points to the request received
......@@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ req_top.url
bereq
~~~~~
-----
This is the request we send to the backend, it is built from the
clients ``req.*`` fields by filtering out "per-hop" fields which
......@@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ bereq.xid
beresp
~~~~~~
------
The response received from the backend, one cache misses, the
store object is built from ``beresp``.
......@@ -1121,7 +1121,7 @@ beresp.was_304
obj
~~~
---
This is the object we found in cache. It cannot be modified.
......@@ -1258,7 +1258,7 @@ obj.uncacheable
resp
~~~~
----
This is the response we send to the client, it is built from either
``beresp`` (pass/miss), ``obj`` (hits) or created from whole cloth (synth).
......@@ -1418,7 +1418,7 @@ resp.time
Special variables
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-----------------
now
......@@ -1444,7 +1444,7 @@ now
:ref:`std.timed_call()` in :ref:`vmod_std(3)`.
sess
~~~~
----
A session corresponds to the "conversation" that Varnish has with a
single client connection, over which one or more request/response
......@@ -1511,7 +1511,7 @@ sess.xid ``VCL >= 4.1``
storage
~~~~~~~
-------
storage.<name>.free_space
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment