Skip to content

V
varnish-cache
Commit 37586e05 authored by Poul-Henning Kamp's avatar Poul-Henning Kamp
Browse files
Options

Use SMA instead in the hope that we can escape what I think is a 

page-size issue on ppc64
parent 94139b30
Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
Showing with 2 additions and 3 deletions
bin/varnishtest/tests/g00002.vtc
View file @ 37586e05
......@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ server s1 {
} -start
varnish v1 \
-storage "-smalloc,2m" \
-cliok "param.set http_gzip_support true" \
-cliok "param.set gzip_memlevel 1" \
-vcl+backend {
......@@ -32,9 +33,7 @@ client c1 {
} -run
# If this fails, the multiple storage allocations did not happen
varnish v1 -expect SMF.s0.c_req != 0
varnish v1 -expect SMF.s0.c_req != 1
varnish v1 -expect SMF.s0.c_req != 2
varnish v1 -expect SMA.s0.c_req > 2
client c1 {
# See varnish can gunzip it.
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment