Make this testcase a bit more predictable.

I am not convinced this test-case is really necessary, since a
similar and much cheaper check is already in place in the
wrk_herdtimer_thread() function.




git-svn-id: http://www.varnish-cache.org/svn/trunk/varnish-cache@5465 d4fa192b-c00b-0410-8231-f00ffab90ce4

bin/varnishtest/tests/r00663.vtc

@@ -5,9 +5,10 @@ test "Test that errno is thread-local"
 
 server s1 {
 	rxreq
-	txresp
+	txresp -bodylen 1
+	sema r1 sync 2
 	rxreq
-	txresp
+	txresp -bodylen 2
 } -start
 
 varnish v1 -vcl+backend {
@@ -48,9 +49,6 @@ varnish v1 -vcl+backend {
 		char buf[16];
 		int fd;
 		
-		/* make sure "one" has done its open */
-		    sleep(1);
-		
 		fd = open("/dev/null", O_RDONLY);
 		
 		sprintf(buf, "%d", errno);
@@ -75,6 +73,7 @@ client c1 {
 } -start
 
 client c2 {
+	sema r1 sync 2
 	txreq -url "/two" -hdr "Client: two"
 	rxresp
         expect resp.status == 200